What is a Chicano?

Who the hell knows?
To me, you have to declare yourself a Chicano in order to be a Chicano. That makes a Chicano a Mexican-American with a defiant political attitude that centers on his or her right to self-definition. I’m a Chicano because I say I am.

But no Chicano will agree with me because one of the characteristics of being Chicano is you don’t agree with anybody, or anything. And certainly not another Chicano. We are the only tribe that has all chiefs and no Indians. But don’t ever insult a Chicano about being a Chicano because then all the other Chicanos will be on you with a vengeance. They will even fight each to be first in line to support you.

Cheech Marin on What is a Chicano? 

I’ve always had issues with identity, especially growing up in the United States. Mexicans from Mexico didn’t think you were ever mexican enough to be Mexican and Euro-centric America made it clear that you were not one of them. But to me, the word Chicano, whether I chose to  identify with it or not, gave me the option or rather introduced me to the idea that it was I who had the authority to label myself however the fuck I wanted. 

Anyway, I’ll leave you all with my favorite part of Cheech’s story:

…A bunch of relatives had come over for dinner and everybody was sitting around gabbing and drinking beer. My Uncle Rudy was in the middle of a story: “So, I took the car into the dealer and he said, ‘Yeah, the repairs gonna run you about $250.’ Two-fifty? Estas loco? Hell, just give me a pair of pliers and some tin foil. I’ll fix it - I’m a Chicano mechanic. Two-fifty, mis nalgas.”

And that was the defining epiphany. A Chicano was someone who could do anything. A Chicano was someone who wasn’t going to get ripped off. He was Uncle Rudy. He was industrious, inventive, and he wants another beer. So I got my Uncle Rudy another beer because, on that day, he showed me that I was a Chicano. Hispanic my ass, I’ve been a Chicano ever since.

(via thereverseracist)

For anyone who wonders why I might come across as grumpy all the time, I submit:

“one of the characteristics of being Chicano is you don’t agree with anybody, or anything.”

also, seriously, if you think I’m grumpy all the time, you’re not paying attention.

(via thatneedstogo)

Some ask “Why can’t you people just all be Hispanic?” Same reason that all white people can’t just be called English. Just because you speak English or Spanish does not mean that you are one group. Hispanic is a census term that some dildo in a government office made up to include all Spanish-speaking brown people. It is especially annoying to Chicanos because it is a catch-all term that includes the Spanish conqueror. By definition, it favors European cultural invasion, not indigenous roots. It also includes all Latino groups, which brings us together because Hispanic annoys all Latino groups. Cheech Marin: What Is A Chicano? (via themaykazine)

(via fuckyeahchicanopower)

thinkmexican:

Chicano Park Celebrates Its Status as a National Historic Monument
April 21 marks the 42nd annual festival celebrating Chicano Park’s “international recognition as a major public art site for its commanding mural paintings of the past and present struggle of Mexican and Chicano history.”
It’s hard to believe that what was once “street art” littering the off ramps and the trestles of a bridge now is part of what has become one of San Diego’s cultural landmarks and more, one of our National Historic Monuments.
It started innocently, as all street art begins perhaps, when the neighborhood was denied local access to the beach during because the Department of Defense had other plans for the property. It was WWII, but that didn’t matter. Denial of beachfront access was a source of local resentment of the government and its agencies.
Read More at The Huffington Post
Photo Credit: Flickr User Nathan Gibbs
Stay Connected: Twitter | Facebook

thinkmexican:

Chicano Park Celebrates Its Status as a National Historic Monument

April 21 marks the 42nd annual festival celebrating Chicano Park’s “international recognition as a major public art site for its commanding mural paintings of the past and present struggle of Mexican and Chicano history.”

It’s hard to believe that what was once “street art” littering the off ramps and the trestles of a bridge now is part of what has become one of San Diego’s cultural landmarks and more, one of our National Historic Monuments.

It started innocently, as all street art begins perhaps, when the neighborhood was denied local access to the beach during because the Department of Defense had other plans for the property. It was WWII, but that didn’t matter. Denial of beachfront access was a source of local resentment of the government and its agencies.

Read More at The Huffington Post

Photo Credit: Flickr User Nathan Gibbs

Stay Connected: Twitter | Facebook

(via decolonizeyourmind)

Sana, sana, colita de rana! Si no sanas hoy, sana manana!

Sana, sana, colita de rana! Si no sanas hoy, sana manana!

bursting white bubbles…must be a day that ends in ‘Y’

One of my officemates just asked, “I thought you were Hispanic?” apparently because the other day she asked if I speak Spanish & I told her no. So we had a conversation about how I ID as Xicano & some of the reasons for it &…yeah. it seemed awkward, but maybe just because I used the word “Colonisers” & said that ‘Hispanic’ was made up by the US government & doesn’t actually have anything to do w/my ethnic heritage.

informate:

From the Pew Hispanic Center:
When Labels Don’t Fit: Hispanics and Their Views of Identity
Nearly four decades after the United States government mandated the use of the terms “Hispanic” or “Latino” to categorize Americans who trace their roots to Spanish-speaking countries, a new nationwide survey of Hispanic adults finds that these terms still haven’t been fully embraced by Hispanics themselves. A majority (51%) say they most often identify themselves by their family’s country of origin; just 24% say they prefer a pan-ethnic label.
Moreover, by a ratio of more than two-to-one (69% versus 29%), survey respondents say that the more than 50 million Latinos in the U.S. have many different cultures rather than a shared common culture. Respondents do, however, express a strong, shared connection to the Spanish language. More than eight-in-ten (82%) Latino adults say they speak Spanish, and nearly all (95%) say it is important for future generations to continue to do so.
Hispanics are also divided over how much of a common identity they share with other Americans. About half (47%) say they consider themselves to be very different from the typical American. And just one-in-five (21%) say they use the term “American” most often to describe their identity. On these two measures, U.S.-born Hispanics (who now make up 48% of Hispanic adults in the country) express a stronger sense of affinity with other Americans and America than do immigrant Hispanics.
The survey finds that, regardless of where they were born, large majorities of Latinos say that life in the U.S. is better than in their family’s country of origin. Also, nearly nine-in-ten (87%) say it is important for immigrant Hispanics to learn English in order to succeed in the U.S.
This report explores Latinos’ attitudes about their identity, including race; their language usage patterns; their core values; and their views about the U.S. and their families’ country of origin. It is based on findings from a national bilingual survey of 1,220 Hispanic adults conducted Nov. 9 through Dec. 7, 2011, by the Pew Hispanic Center, a project of the Pew Research Center.
The report, “When Labels Don’t Fit: Hispanics and Their Views of Identity,” authored by Paul Taylor, Director, Pew Hispanic Center, Mark Hugo Lopez, Associate Director, Pew Hispanic Center, Jessica Hamar Martínez, Research Associate, Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, and Gabriel Velasco, Research Analyst, Pew Hispanic Center, is available at the Pew Hispanic Center’s website, www.pewhispanic.org.
The Pew Hispanic Center, a project of the Pew Research Center, is a nonpartisan, non-advocacy research organization based in Washington, D.C. and is funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts.

informate:

From the Pew Hispanic Center:

When Labels Don’t Fit: Hispanics and Their Views of Identity

Nearly four decades after the United States government mandated the use of the terms “Hispanic” or “Latino” to categorize Americans who trace their roots to Spanish-speaking countries, a new nationwide survey of Hispanic adults finds that these terms still haven’t been fully embraced by Hispanics themselves. A majority (51%) say they most often identify themselves by their family’s country of origin; just 24% say they prefer a pan-ethnic label.

Moreover, by a ratio of more than two-to-one (69% versus 29%), survey respondents say that the more than 50 million Latinos in the U.S. have many different cultures rather than a shared common culture. Respondents do, however, express a strong, shared connection to the Spanish language. More than eight-in-ten (82%) Latino adults say they speak Spanish, and nearly all (95%) say it is important for future generations to continue to do so.

Hispanics are also divided over how much of a common identity they share with other Americans. About half (47%) say they consider themselves to be very different from the typical American. And just one-in-five (21%) say they use the term “American” most often to describe their identity. On these two measures, U.S.-born Hispanics (who now make up 48% of Hispanic adults in the country) express a stronger sense of affinity with other Americans and America than do immigrant Hispanics.

The survey finds that, regardless of where they were born, large majorities of Latinos say that life in the U.S. is better than in their family’s country of origin. Also, nearly nine-in-ten (87%) say it is important for immigrant Hispanics to learn English in order to succeed in the U.S.

This report explores Latinos’ attitudes about their identity, including race; their language usage patterns; their core values; and their views about the U.S. and their families’ country of origin. It is based on findings from a national bilingual survey of 1,220 Hispanic adults conducted Nov. 9 through Dec. 7, 2011, by the Pew Hispanic Center, a project of the Pew Research Center.

The report, “When Labels Don’t Fit: Hispanics and Their Views of Identity,” authored by Paul Taylor, Director, Pew Hispanic Center, Mark Hugo Lopez, Associate Director, Pew Hispanic Center, Jessica Hamar Martínez, Research Associate, Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, and Gabriel Velasco, Research Analyst, Pew Hispanic Center, is available at the Pew Hispanic Center’s website, www.pewhispanic.org.

The Pew Hispanic Center, a project of the Pew Research Center, is a nonpartisan, non-advocacy research organization based in Washington, D.C. and is funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts.

(via fuckyeahlatinamericanhistory)

barrio2barrio:

#Wanted #Educated #Latina #Chicana #Graduate , would love to find one (Taken with instagram)

barrio2barrio:

#Wanted #Educated #Latina #Chicana #Graduate , would love to find one (Taken with instagram)

(via elisamexica)

“spanish speaking minority”

milkeemountainmama:

so—the question: why would he call himself this instead of “hispanic” or (god forbid) latino or “country of origin”-american?

honestly, when i very first saw the picture, my breath was gone, this guy looks like half of my damn latino family. i immediately thought he’s ‘hispanic’—but now i qualify it and say—*if* he doesn’t identify as white.

but—the response of white folks to it being announced he’s a “spanish speaking minority” has been so infuriating—because they honestly can’t see that what they are saying and how they are saying it is invisibilizing THEIR OWN VIOLENCE—but also that in distancing themselves (IT WASN’T US), they are *protecting* white supremacy—they are using the strategy of making the “problem” be about out of control animals fighting amongst themselves—rather than *white supremacy*, *white nationalism*, *white heteropatriarchy*.

and you see this in the possible reason that Zimmerman would *choose* to call himself “spanish speaking minority.”

he is sitting on the crux of his *own* prison pipeline, in the form of ICE built detention centers—his lawyers must surely KNOW this. they need him to be white *enough*—such that the (white supremacist) state of florida does not divest itself from protecting him.

and why would it divest itself? think of florida’s thriving reputation as a resting spot for *tired white northern liberals* who need a place to retire. florida has its *economy* tied up in being that resting spot—and if things start to get messy—if white people start to feel uncomfortable—where if they say “i’m living in florida now” to their friends and they no longer get sighs of envy, but standoffish questions (why on *earth* would you settle there?)—white people will economically divest themselves from Florida. And Florida’s economy will not be pretty.  Florida *depends* on appealing to white liberal reformists—but as infuriating as they are—white liberal reformists *can* actually see the connections between KKK lynching of yesteryear and the modern day form its shaped into.

So—if Zimmerman *becomes hispanic*—where there is already a pipeline built to get him easily out of the way—*florida will do it*—and they’ll have the added benefit of doing it to the applause of outraged white liberal reformists. Florida doesn’t need the problem he is creating. individuals are *always* easily sacrificed to protect “the greater good.”

so zimmerman’s lawyers *need* him to be white—but not quite. they *also* need him to not be a racist. because what’s worse than being a murderer (as we’ve seen, even right here on tumblr)? being called a racist. if he’s a racist, it won’t matter if he’s white. liberal white reformists can spot hateful racists too. they can’t see those racists when they’re wrapped up in a business suit, but they sure the fuck can see them if they have tattoos and have confederate flags and whsiper fucking **** at a kid before they shoot him.

what to do? what to do? what to do? zimmerman is the physical emobiement of what it means to exist in multiple categories in this country. even as light skinned as he is, people are SURE he has physical characteristics that mark him as “really” non-white. zimmerman has a “choice” in how he identifies, but that choice just in this conversation alone is constantly taken away, talked over, not respected, or assumed. the “choice” he has is also structurally enforced—he doesn’t get the choice to *NOT* make a choice. he *has* to be *something*—because if he wants resources, *that choice is how he’s going to get them*. but if even as he thinks he has a choice to “make the right choice”—to side with white supremacy—White supremacy has *already dumped him*. Even after white supremacy promised him—if you assimilate, we won’t *care* where you came from or who you are. If you’re legal and you do it the right way, we don’t *care*.

but white supremacy is showing its face—it really *does* care, and it never stopped noticing the way his skin was *exactly* white and it never stopped noticing who his mother was and it never stopped noticing his black hair or the way his tongue rolled in spite of itself.

Which means, fellow Latin@s, Chican@s, Mexican@s, and even “hispanics”…that right now, the point is NOT “don’t let them divide us.”

the point is to understand *properly* how white supremacy works, and the multiple complicated ways it enacts itself on our bodies, lives and communities. The point is to ask ourselves—why *would* an assimilated man (whether he identifies as hispanic or as white or *whatever*—he *became* what he is through assimilation) regard a 17 year old black boy as a *threat*? why *would* he hunt down that child and murder him in cold blood? what does what he did have to do with assimilation? What *is* it that assimilation thing is asking of us? and what does trayvon’s murder have to do with angie zapata’s  murder? was it *really* just that “hispanic” bad apple men decided today was the day to kill somebody? Or is there something going on with this weird mix of liberal white reformists, deeply white supremacists states depending on travel economies and white liberal vacation fantasies, ambiguously white but not quite cis men, and assimilation?

why is it acceptable to even *imagine* a mestizaje with no black/afro roots? why is ambiguity centered on the experiences of ambiguously white but not quite? what are the different ways we use ambiguity within the process of assimilation and white supremacy? what benefits do white but not white folks get within white supremacist systems? what violent trade off are we all forced to negotiate? what is it that allows men to use that ambiguity for protection, when most of us, that ambiguity exists as a space of violent attack?

what does it mean to be black in our countries of origin? what does it mean to be white? what does it mean to be *no longer white* in the US?

There are a LOT of questions our communities need to be asking ourselves right now. and sitting with and honestly working through. false calls for “unity” are false because oh, woah—a hispanic may have just murdered a black boy. proving that *unity never existed to begin with*.

so instead of trying to impose positivity on a relationship that has violence laced all through it—(or, existed within very specific communities that made *concious* decisions to work together and negotiate relationships together), we could be brave. and start asking the right questions.

(via bad-dominicana)

lenxo:

con partes mexicanas…

lenxo:

con partes mexicanas…

(via tierracita)

is this a Latin@ thing?
regardless, it’s all the GPOY

is this a Latin@ thing?

regardless, it’s all the GPOY

(via tierracita)

I made a fb update asking for Mexican self-enrichment week suggestions

rosadefuego:

and people answered with a bunch of stereotypes

i mean yeah haha so funny but

seriously what the fuck

fuck you

i wanted suggestions

i know the stereotypes

my suggestions:

Those are some recommendations off the top of my head. 

asker

Anonymous asked: ...how do you pronounce "Xicano"?

the “X” is pronounced as a hard “CH”, as in “chair”.

[chee-KAH-no]

queerandpresentdanger:

… so this is my Mexican-American Literature professor

he’s gonna smuggle Latin@ books into Arizona over Spring Break.