(via slaykob)

Yes? No? That bb is 14 kinds of cute tho right?

Yes? No? That bb is 14 kinds of cute tho right?

laylalicious-is-so-vicious:

haha love Chief Joseph giving side-eye like the badass that he is!!!! Ni’imipuu Pride, bbys! We got it!

laylalicious-is-so-vicious:

haha love Chief Joseph giving side-eye like the badass that he is!!!! Ni’imipuu Pride, bbys! We got it!

magnastorm:

Possible concept for a future Monster High mod (Cleo). 

Please don’t do this. It reeks of Native American stereotypes, cultural appropriation & other unnecessarily disrespectful… bullshit (really, there’s no other word for it).
Definitely explore your creativity in customising Monster High dolls into your own characters, but do it in a way that’s not shitting on cultures you’re not very familiar with—and from this sketch, I can tell you’re not very familiar w/Native American cultures, so don’t even try to defend it from that vantage point.

magnastorm:

Possible concept for a future Monster High mod (Cleo). 

Please don’t do this. It reeks of Native American stereotypes, cultural appropriation & other unnecessarily disrespectful… bullshit (really, there’s no other word for it).

Definitely explore your creativity in customising Monster High dolls into your own characters, but do it in a way that’s not shitting on cultures you’re not very familiar with—and from this sketch, I can tell you’re not very familiar w/Native American cultures, so don’t even try to defend it from that vantage point.

yethathne:

powwow love

yethathne:

powwow love

(via missgreyday)

selchieproductions:

Alaska Native languages: It all comes down to choices© Xh’unei Lance A. Twitchell / Juneau Empire

Linguists have been predicting the death of Alaska Native languages for decades now, and whether or not those predictions prove accurate comes down to the choices you and I make on a daily basis. The past 200 years have been devastating; from boarding schools to disease to social discriminations, we are now left with the aftermath of successful attempts to destroy languages and cultures. But that does not mean we have to resign our efforts or just allow this to happen. In fact, it leaves us all with a tremendous amount of power and the decision is right here before us: speak now or let it go forever.
Our languages have developed in specific places for thousands and thousands of years. Within them we see patterns of migrations, grammar that allows us to see the world differently, and an ability to communicate more closely with our ancestors and the natural world around us. Just the other day I sat with some school children and watched a Tlingit speaker talk to the porpoises. He called out to them, the ones we call “cheech,” and they came back to the surface in response, showing themselves to the kids who sat down to learn from the Tlingit speaker.
And there is more. The recent release of Tom Thornton’s book, “Haa Léelk’w Hás Aaní Saax’ú / Our Grandparents’ Names on the Land,” gives us nearly 3,500 names to put back onto the land on which we live in Southeast Alaska. These names collectively show an intense and long-standing relationship with the land. They connect us linguistically to stories, migrations, animals, the supernatural and more. When you think about it, and when you really try to use these names, you then realize that you are not just living in Anywhere, USA.
But there are so few people who are using our language. Recent surveys leave us with this estimate: there are fewer than 250 people who can speak a Southeast Alaska Native Language. That is three languages combined. Tlingit has about 200, Haida has about a half-dozen, and Coastal Tsimshian has about 30. This means that the clock is ticking quickly for each of these languages. This also means that we have some important decisions to make.
I could spend a thousand words on the reasons for language decline in indigenous populations. I could spend a thousand more on potential solutions, useful studies, new curriculum ideas. In reality, all of that compares very little to these two questions: Who will speak? Who will listen?
There is nothing that will determine the future of our languages more than this. Despite everything that has happened, and all the things we may think should happen, we have to realize that we are the ones deciding to let these languages die. Maybe we have been fooled into thinking that progress moves us towards an English-only world. Perhaps we have been beaten and teased and shamed into staying away from our languages.
I can understand those things. But we have to move beyond them, as a region, and listen to these languages. Every time I hear notions of racial supremacy disguised as progress or world economy, I think about how sneaky all those things are. But I still stumble through the language with my baby daughter when we are home alone in the mornings. I still talk to the cat and whomever else will listen. I make my family guess what I am saying, and even better yet, they are just starting to figure it out. I speak with other speakers, and learn what I can when I can.
We need our communities to embrace the existence of our languages. This is more than just nodding or saying, “good idea.” This language was beaten, washed, and bribed out of our people. There is a trauma here that was government-sponsored, church-driven, and rarely resisted at the community level. That means that we can choose to work together to make sure these languages have a place to live, and that is the same place where they were born. It does not matter what your ethnicity is.
This is not a race issue. This is a human issue. I think of it as this: you are walking past a dying person. Do you just walk past? It does not matter how it happened or what you may think of that person. What type of human are you? When we examine the history of this area, we can see that the human obligation is to help people survive and to be kind. Recently, I heard a wise man say that politics is bullying, and Alaska Natives do not make good bullies.
The goal of Alaska Native language revitalization is not to force anyone to do anything or to try and destroy anyone else’s identity or sense of place. Ironically, there seems to be a real fear of the revival of Alaska Native languages, or at the very least a reluctance to see it. But it is coming. Our languages are now beginning to go through the process of death, the result of decades upon decades of a killing machine that we can call assimilation. We will no longer allow that to happen.
Study after study has shown that bilingual people test higher in education. Study after study has shown that when you take away a group’s established identity and substitute it with something else, it creates systemwide failure within that group. Suicide rates among Alaska Natives are enormous, and most social gauges show a people in peril. But we do not have to stay on this road. We can make our own decisions and future. We can open our minds to a new existence that allows languages to thrive, and connects generations back to time immemorial.
We have talked about language revitalization in our region, but we are not there yet. It will take a sea change among our communities, organizations, and individuals. It will take unity like we have not yet realized. It will take partnerships that leave the self behind. We will discover that we are all human beings, and that connections to each other, our land, and our ancestors will make every one of us stronger. We have incredible power and we will learn how to use it.
Speak. Listen. Do it every day. Change the future and the world.

• Xh’unei, Lance A. Twitchell, is Assistant Professor of Alaska Native Languages at the University of Alaska Southeast. 

selchieproductions:

Alaska Native languages: It all comes down to choices
© Xh’unei Lance A. Twitchell / Juneau Empire

Linguists have been predicting the death of Alaska Native languages for decades now, and whether or not those predictions prove accurate comes down to the choices you and I make on a daily basis. The past 200 years have been devastating; from boarding schools to disease to social discriminations, we are now left with the aftermath of successful attempts to destroy languages and cultures. But that does not mean we have to resign our efforts or just allow this to happen. In fact, it leaves us all with a tremendous amount of power and the decision is right here before us: speak now or let it go forever.

Our languages have developed in specific places for thousands and thousands of years. Within them we see patterns of migrations, grammar that allows us to see the world differently, and an ability to communicate more closely with our ancestors and the natural world around us. Just the other day I sat with some school children and watched a Tlingit speaker talk to the porpoises. He called out to them, the ones we call “cheech,” and they came back to the surface in response, showing themselves to the kids who sat down to learn from the Tlingit speaker.

And there is more. The recent release of Tom Thornton’s book, “Haa Léelk’w Hás Aaní Saax’ú / Our Grandparents’ Names on the Land,” gives us nearly 3,500 names to put back onto the land on which we live in Southeast Alaska. These names collectively show an intense and long-standing relationship with the land. They connect us linguistically to stories, migrations, animals, the supernatural and more. When you think about it, and when you really try to use these names, you then realize that you are not just living in Anywhere, USA.

But there are so few people who are using our language. Recent surveys leave us with this estimate: there are fewer than 250 people who can speak a Southeast Alaska Native Language. That is three languages combined. Tlingit has about 200, Haida has about a half-dozen, and Coastal Tsimshian has about 30. This means that the clock is ticking quickly for each of these languages. This also means that we have some important decisions to make.

I could spend a thousand words on the reasons for language decline in indigenous populations. I could spend a thousand more on potential solutions, useful studies, new curriculum ideas. In reality, all of that compares very little to these two questions: Who will speak? Who will listen?

There is nothing that will determine the future of our languages more than this. Despite everything that has happened, and all the things we may think should happen, we have to realize that we are the ones deciding to let these languages die. Maybe we have been fooled into thinking that progress moves us towards an English-only world. Perhaps we have been beaten and teased and shamed into staying away from our languages.

I can understand those things. But we have to move beyond them, as a region, and listen to these languages. Every time I hear notions of racial supremacy disguised as progress or world economy, I think about how sneaky all those things are. But I still stumble through the language with my baby daughter when we are home alone in the mornings. I still talk to the cat and whomever else will listen. I make my family guess what I am saying, and even better yet, they are just starting to figure it out. I speak with other speakers, and learn what I can when I can.

We need our communities to embrace the existence of our languages. This is more than just nodding or saying, “good idea.” This language was beaten, washed, and bribed out of our people. There is a trauma here that was government-sponsored, church-driven, and rarely resisted at the community level. That means that we can choose to work together to make sure these languages have a place to live, and that is the same place where they were born. It does not matter what your ethnicity is.

This is not a race issue. This is a human issue. I think of it as this: you are walking past a dying person. Do you just walk past? It does not matter how it happened or what you may think of that person. What type of human are you? When we examine the history of this area, we can see that the human obligation is to help people survive and to be kind. Recently, I heard a wise man say that politics is bullying, and Alaska Natives do not make good bullies.

The goal of Alaska Native language revitalization is not to force anyone to do anything or to try and destroy anyone else’s identity or sense of place. Ironically, there seems to be a real fear of the revival of Alaska Native languages, or at the very least a reluctance to see it. But it is coming. Our languages are now beginning to go through the process of death, the result of decades upon decades of a killing machine that we can call assimilation. We will no longer allow that to happen.

Study after study has shown that bilingual people test higher in education. Study after study has shown that when you take away a group’s established identity and substitute it with something else, it creates systemwide failure within that group. Suicide rates among Alaska Natives are enormous, and most social gauges show a people in peril. But we do not have to stay on this road. We can make our own decisions and future. We can open our minds to a new existence that allows languages to thrive, and connects generations back to time immemorial.

We have talked about language revitalization in our region, but we are not there yet. It will take a sea change among our communities, organizations, and individuals. It will take unity like we have not yet realized. It will take partnerships that leave the self behind. We will discover that we are all human beings, and that connections to each other, our land, and our ancestors will make every one of us stronger. We have incredible power and we will learn how to use it.

Speak. Listen. Do it every day. Change the future and the world.

• Xh’unei, Lance A. Twitchell, is Assistant Professor of Alaska Native Languages at the University of Alaska Southeast. 

annoyed

charge-into-the-sun:

annoyed with this whole idea that someone who doesn’t look like a certain ethnicity can’t/shouldn’t wear certain clothing - that’s considered ethnic/tribal/etc

ok I don’t think stores should be creating clothing called “tribal”, “Indian”, etc because it is cultural appropriation 

However, I have friends who are Native but “don’t look Native”. They are truly White passing POC (legit, not Cherokee princesses or people with really far back ancestry) and they often tend to wear clothing from Native designers. I notice the difference in how they get treated when wearing this clothing compared to when I go out wearing the same clothes. 

No one questions my identity or bugs me about wearing these types of clothing. They often just assume that I am Native or Indigenous. My friends have actually been lectured on cultural appropriation by Non-Natives when they wear Native designed clothing. They are not culturally appropriating anything because they actually live on a reserve and they are members of our reserve.

I don’t like the idea of this happening because it’s like saying a White looking person is always capable of committing cultural appropriation but a darker person is incapable of committing cultural appropriation. If you are not from the group where this design is from then it can still be considered cultural appropriation if you are a POC.

If I wear designs from another Indigenous group without learning about their rules and opinions on outsiders wearing that design then even I am committing cultural appropriation. If I wear Maori designs without a proper understanding of it then even as a Native person I am committing cultural appropriation. 

Cultural appropriation is not just about White people or White looking people wearing specific designs. It’s about the proper understanding of the impact on a community/group when outsiders use or abuse their symbols, designs, culture, language, etc. It’s about the real meaning about these types of clothes and designs. It’s about learning the difference between designs that are considered cultural appropriation and designs that are actually Native/Indigenous. 

I agree completley.

The issue that I can see (at least for myself) is that it seems to be much more common to encounter appropriation or pretendian styles purchased from stores like Urban Outfitters. I’ve noticed that my default reaction is to brace for disappointment while I figure out what’s going on.

California was an Indian slave state, and it became a slave state by an official act of the first California legislature…the California state legislature passed an Indian slave act on April 22, 1850. Under provisions of this act the various offices of the justice of the peace acted as slave markets. For a small fee any white man could ‘buy an Indian slave’ and would have certificates from the state of California affirming his ownership of the Indian and full rights of his charge until he reached the age of 18 in the case of a male, and 15 in the case of a female. The California legislature ten years later, in 1860, found that possibly it had made a mistake and took action to amend the slave act. The amendments agreed upon only increased the length of indenture to 30 years in the case of a male and to 25 years in the case of a female. This same act, conveniently, stated that no white man could be convicted of any crime upon the testimony of an Indian. All this, under the clever but deceptive guise of governmental protection of the Indian! Indian slaves by the hundreds, however, were worked to death, starved to death and beaten to death…The desperadoes rode into Indian lands to cut down and butcher the Indians by the hundreds. Surviving children were taken to be sold as slaves. Long after the end of the Civil War, Indian children were still being held as slaves in California. — Allan Morris (Klamath River Yurok; 1967)

(via pretzlcoatl)

digatisdi:

Always relevant.

digatisdi:

Always relevant.

(via ayiman)

omgthatartifact:

Sewing Kit
Lakota or Sioux, 19th century
The Brooklyn Museum

omgthatartifact:

Sewing Kit

Lakota or Sioux, 19th century

The Brooklyn Museum

(via adailyriot)

The Untold Story of The Iroquois Influence On Early Feminists

deluxvivens:

by Sally Roesch Wagner

I had been haunted by a question to the past, a mystery of feminist history: How did the radical suffragists come to their vision, a vision not of Band-Aid reform but of a reconstituted world completely transformed?

For 20 years I had immersed myself in the writings of early United States women’s rights activists — Matilda Joslyn Gage (1826-1898), Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815-1902), Lucretia Mott (1793-1880) — yet I could not fathom how they dared to dream their revolutionary dream. Living under the ideological hegemony of nineteenth-century United States, they had no say in government, religion, economics, or social life (“the four-fold oppression” of their lives, Gage and Stanton called it.) Whatever made them think that human harmony — based on the perfect equality of all people, with women absolute sovereigns of their lives — was an achievable goal?

Surely these white women, living under conditions of virtual slavery, did not get their vision in a vacuum. Somehow they were able to see from point A, where they stood — corseted, ornamental, legally nonpersons — to point C, the “regenerated” world Gage predicted, in which all repressive institutions would be destroyed. What was point B in their lives, the earthly alternative that drove their feminist spirit — not a utopian pipe dream but a sensible, do-able paradigm?

Then I realized I had been skimming over the source of their inspiration without noticing it. My own unconscious white supremacy had kept me from recognizing what these prototypical feminists kept insisting in their writings: They caught a glimpse of the possibility of freedom because they knew women who lived liberated lives, women who had always possessed rights beyond their wildest imagination — Iroquois women.

The more evidence I uncovered of this indelible Native American influence on the vision of early United States feminists, the more certain I became that this story must be told.

Read More

(via heroin-e)

Casting Call: Native American Actors

anestivega:

Maluco Studios, a production company specializing in the martial arts/action genre with bases in Florida and Bangkok Thailand, is looking for Native American/Indigenous actors for multiple upcoming film projects.

If you are Native (any North/South American Nation/Tribe is fine), live in Florida and are in the craft of acting or interested in getting into it, please send us your information as we need actors and consultants! If you are interested in the production side of filmmaking, we are offering apprenticeships as well.

We cannot stress this enough: You have to identify as Native American. A familiarity with your Nation’s history and culture as well as and understanding of (and even participate in addressing) issues today is highly encouraged. Being mixed is completely fine, but any information submitted to the effect of “My great grandmother was a Cherokee princess” or “I’m 40% Blackfoot” will not be considered and will be discarded immediately. Any actor of any other ethnicity that submits their information claiming to be able to “pull off the Native look” will also be added to our Ban List (yes, we have one).

Maluco Studios is a film company that prides itself on breaking away from the norm. We create stories and characters that break away from stereotypes and address real issues and struggles, finding the balance between informative and visually entertaining.

If you are Native/Indigenous, live in Florida and already (or want to be) involved in filmmaking on either side of the camera, please send resumes, biographies, headshots/pictures, demo reels, etc. to malucostudios@gmail.com with “Casting Call: Native American Actors” in the subject line.

Peace & Blessings.

signal boost!

(via masteradept)